10/8 The Constitution and the Federalist (Part 2)

10/8 The Constitution and the Federalist (Part 2)

The Federalist No.10

"A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the Union than a particular member of it; in the same proportion as such a malady is more likely to taint a particular county or district, than an entire State" (p. 96).

                   In this passage Madison is making the case that a more diverse population will make it harder for any single "faction" to have too much power. In this example he stating that even though the poor outnumber the rich, it will be much easier for the poor to influence a "county or district" than a whole nation, simply because a more diverse class base will lessen the influence of the most populated class. Madison writes this passage because he believes that a federal government can and will be capable of managing a stable nation. 

The Federalist No.78

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid (p. 120)."

In this passage Hamilton makes it clear that no legislative act can be considered valid if it goes against the Constitution. In his examples of the deputy and his principal and the servant and his master, Hamilton is stating that all legislative acts are subordinates to the Constitution. I believe he is writing this passage in light of the possibilities of judges abusing their judicial powers for their own interest.

9/24 The American Revolution

9/24 The American Revolution

The Declaration of Independence

"That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles  and organizing its powers in such form, as to them seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than the right to themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed"(p.59)   

          In this passage Jefferson says that the people being governed have the right to choose who should governs them and what form of government should govern them. He also makes it clear that the people should not “abolish” a form of government simply because something goes wrong. Life is not perfect so neither will government.

Jefferson writes this passage because of his experience under an autocratic government, where the people don't have a say in how they are governed.

An Address to the Inhabitants of the British Settlements in America, Upon Slave-Keeping

“We have many well attested anecdotes of as sublime and disinterested virtue among them as ever adorned a Roman or a Christian character. But we are to distinguish between an African in is own country and an African in the state of slavery in America. Slavery is foreign to the human mind, that the moral faculties, as well as those of the understanding are debased, and rendered torpid by it. All the vices which are charged upon the Negros in the southern colonies and the West-Indies, such as idleness, treachery, theft, and the like are the genuine offspring of slavery, and serve as an argument to prove that they were no intended by providence for it”(p.44).

In this passage Rush is making is point as to why the enslaving of humans is naturally wrong. He states that “Negroes” are as virtues as Europeans and to prove his point he ask his readers to compare an African in his homeland and one that is enslaved in America. Rush is saying this because he does not agree with the popular belief that Africans are inferior to Europeans and all the faults (“vices”) that are associated with slaves all stem from the burden of slavery. 

9/17 Political Identity & Political Culture (Part 2)

9/17 Political Identity & Political Culture (Part 2)

"Now that is a model of the sort of foreign practice, founded on foreign problems, at which a man's first impulse is naturally to laugh. Nor have I any intention of apologising for my laughter. A man is perfectly entitled to laugh at a thing because he happens to find it incomprehensible. What he has no right to do is to laugh at it as incomprehensible, and then criticise it as if he comprehended it. The very fact of its unfamiliarity and mystery ought to set him thinking about the deeper causes that make people so different from himself, and that without merely assuming that they must be inferior to himself.”(p.5).

In this passage Chesterton states that it is okay to laugh at something you may find unusual but it’s not okay to laugh at something you don't understand and then criticize it. I believe that in writing this passage Chesterton wants his readers to understand that a man should not conceive the fact that he finds something “incomprehensible” and then act as if he truly does understand by criticizing it. In other words Chesterton is saying that not understanding something should make us think about why we don’t understand instead of writing it off as inferior or wrong. 

9/10 Political Identity & Political Culture

"We have insisted that the immigrant whom we welcomed escaping from the very exclusive nationalism of his European home shall forthwith adopt a nationalism just as exclusive, just as narrow, and even less legitimate because it is founded on no warm traditions of his own. Yet a nation like France is said to permit a formal and legal dual citizenship even at the present time. Though a citizen of hers may pretend to cast off his allegiance in favor of some other sovereignty, he is still subject to her laws when he returns. Once a citizen, always a citizen, no matter how many new-citizenships he may embrace. And such a dual citizenship seems to us sound and right. For it recognizes that, although the Frenchman may accept the formal institutional framework of his new country and indeed become intensely loyal to it, yet his Frenchness he will never lose."

          In my interpretation of this passage Bourne states that it is unrealistic to expect a immigrant to completely cast away is devotion and interest in the country of his birth and exclusively be loyal to his new country. Bourne believes that dual citizenship is a more appropriate process of naturalization because dual citizenship doesn't hide the fact that immigrants have ties to other nations.

          I chose this passage because I agree with Bourne's point. Being a naturalized citizen myself I have first hand experience of the whole naturalization process.I personally find it impossible for me to completely assimilate to my new country and wipe myself clean of the traditions I was born with and to have no interest in my previous home nation. I believe that this passage relates to the course because citizenship is a key requirement in order to participate in any political system.